A:
Lets start with what might be causing the problem. You're specifying pool1: to listen to IPv4, which means that whatever you're sending to the phone will be coming back through port 23 and will be sent to your firewall in the usual way. However, your VPN client needs to send traffic to port 23 for you to be able to SSH into the box and set up the VPN.
Now, I've never used a VPN with a Cisco PIX, but I imagine the way they work is that you configure the VPN client to send traffic to the firewall's inbound port 23, which has a NAT rule allowing outbound traffic to go through to the Internet.
So, I think you might need to make sure that your VPN client has this correct NAT rule configured, but this would be just an educated guess.
If you don't know how to do this, you should probably ask your organization's system administrator or whoever they give you access to.
Q:
Dynamically add a pushpin to Mapbox
I'm new to Mapbox, and I'm trying to make a web map with a list of GPS coordinates.
I would like to dynamically add a pushpin to each coordinate.
When the map loads, the first user will load an initial list of coordinates and a pushpin will be added for each one of them. Then, after a button is clicked, another user will have access to the map and can edit the list of coordinates and add/remove/edit the pushpins.
After the map loads for the second user, the pushpins should disappear from the first user's map.
It is possible to do this using Mapbox?
In other words, I'm trying to do something like the picture below:
A:
You can accomplish this by querying your mapbox access token in the backend server and then add/remove the pin. You don't need to ask each user to update their access token.
There are a number of ways to generate a mapbox access token, but I think will work well for your purpose.
After two months of campaigning and four televised debates, Canada’s 2019 election appears to be neck and neck.
According to the latest polls, the Conservatives are between 27.8 and 32.5 points ahead of their 01e38acffe
A:
You could try and attack the site from the outside and if all else fails try and find out where he is physically located.
Another tactic is to use packet analysis to trace the attack back.
Using the tool EtherPeek you can view the network traffic of the malicious website. Once you have found the attack vector to this machine you can then see which system is most vulnerable to these attacks.
You can also take a look at the way the website was built and see if they used software they are known for having vulnerability in.
What you are doing is trying to find an entry point to the site. The site itself has no exploitable vulnerabilities. You have to find something that will let you in, you then attack this point and hopefully you will find a way in.
Q:
Is it possible to have a one-to-many relationship with DB2 using Java?
I've been using a one-to-many relationship to link my main Java object to an object stored in the database. This is done using a simple map with a list of key/value pairs. For instance, the main Java object would look like this:
class main {
private List objects;
public main(List objects) {
this.objects = objects;
}
}
And the database object would look like this:
class dbObject {
private int id;
private String name;
// getter/setter
}
This worked well until DB2 v9.5 came out. With DB2 v9.5, I now have to use a table with two columns, one for the PK and one for the ID. That looks like this:
TABLE main
ID NAME
--- ----
1 Fred
2 Harry
3 Jill
TABLE dbObject
ID NAME
--- ----
1 test1
2 test2
3 test3
Is there a way to have a one-to-many relationship with DB2 while using a Java object model?
A:
In 9.5, you can still do what you are doing. Just make the other field defined as a V
Related links:
Comentários